The new FireFox seems to be quite a bit speedier, and that's the bit I like.

Ofcourse, my position as 'just a user' doesn't give me much room for valid criticism. Miscommunication like this should not be able to happen. This is an issue regardless of the comparative qualities of the artwork.

, as an open source leader, should hold to a higher standard of communication with the userbase. I realise email is more convenient, but email also makes the project closed off to the outside world. I hope future project issues will not be relegated to private email but put in the bug system where they belong. This should have been settled in a bug to make default artwork trilicensed. More importantly, these issues should not have been settled in private email (which is what caused the problem in the first place). It would help to see Arvid's mail that made the people believe he wasn't going to relicense. There has to be some response to disprove what Arvid is saying. It does not look like the claim that Arvid was entirely unwilling to use the trilicense holds true. I have to say, as a regular firefox user and an outsider looking in, this looks bad.

Mozilla firefox theme maker